November 18, 2015
Entire study is available in PDF format (6 MB)
The MH17 Shootdown – Origin of Equipment and Military Control of the Area of the Zaroshchens’ke Ukrainian Armed Forces BUK Deployment
Abstract
MH17 – Paris NO Match
October 15, 2015 (updated Oct. 25)
Time to read —45 minutes
There are four photos and three videos showing the alleged rebel’s Buk. Only the “Paris Match” photos show this Buk at a close distance, which a group of investigative journalists named Bellingcat uses as proof that Buk came from Russia because of “Buk’s fingerprints.” These photos look clearly photoshopped to the naked eye.
MH17 – Billy versus Bensmann
October 10, 2015
Civil journalists, bloggers, hobby investigators -whatever you call them- have become a relevant factor in the unprecedented information war raging around the shootdown of flight Malaysia MH17.
Continue reading “MH17 – Billy versus Bensmann”
MH17 – ‘Buk plume’ burns witness
July 26, 2015
More than a year has passed since Malaysian flight MH17 crashed, but we are still waiting for the publication of “overwhelming evidence” of Russian culpability.
MH17: Buk + Air-to-Air missiles R-60?
June 12, 2015
– by Irina Petrakova, journalist from Moscow, Russia.
A week ago Almaz-Antey, the manufacturer of Buk, held a press conference. During this very interesting event the engineers of the company explained in detail what is wrong with the Western narratives.
Explicitly not excluded by spokesmen of Almaz Antey: the scenario in which air-to-air missiles fired by fighter jet(s) played a role.
MH17 – hardcore Dutch war propaganda
January 24, 2015
In this article I will dissect a particularly vicious piece of propaganda disseminated by RTL Nieuws on December 22nd 2014. For practical purposes split up in four separate sections with transcripts and my comments.
Mea Culpa
September 29, 2015
MH17-research – until today September 29, 2015 I wrote more than 35,000 words on all kinds of subjects related to the MH17 shoot down. Mistakes are inevitable and I think it is good practice to admit them, be open about them and give credit to the people who correct them.
Why I’m a Troll
September 29, 2015
Russia and Defense expert Hans de Vreij didn’t like my interview in Sputnik:
After my tweet: “Dutch Ministry of Truth rep @hdevreij and my hat is nicer than yours”……
……. a typical example of Dutch pluriform inquisitive open for debate journalists response:
Who cares for MH17 eyewitnesses?
November 3, 2014
The Dutch, who are leading the MH17 Joint International team (JIT) think it is increasingly unlikely investigators would be able to reach the Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash zone in Eastern Ukraine.
The announcement comes at a moment the version of a jet fighter downing the airliner for the first time receives serious attention in the West. Countless eyewitness circulating on internet claim at least one military jet flew in the vicinity of MH17 as it disintegrated in the sky on July 17.
MH17 – ‘Buk plume’ burns witness
July 26, 2015
Digitally altered image posted within 3 hours after MH17 crashed.
More than a year has passed since Malaysian flight MH17 crashed, but we are still waiting for the publication of “overwhelming evidence” of Russian culpability.
The only ‘visual proof’ a Buk missile was fired from rebel controlled territory is a photo posted by an anonymous Twitter account three hours after the crash.
MH17 – another BUK on another Day
July 12, 2015
Mainstream media start to acknowledge Kiev lied about not having jet fighters in the air. Good moment to look at alternative Buk narratives.
MH17: Examination of evidence from social media
June 7, 2015
Sergey Mastepanov – mh17@energia.su – http://energia.su/mh17
Introduces himself as a 29-year-old computer programmer. A native Russian speaker who has been monitoring the news surrounding Ukraine since Autumn 2013:
Continue reading “MH17: Examination of evidence from social media”