October 15, 2015 (updated Oct. 25)
Time to read —45 minutes
There are four photos and three videos showing the alleged rebel’s Buk. Only the “Paris Match” photos show this Buk at a close distance, which a group of investigative journalists named Bellingcat uses as proof that Buk came from Russia because of “Buk’s fingerprints.” These photos look clearly photoshopped to the naked eye.
October 10, 2015
Civil journalists, bloggers, hobby investigators -whatever you call them- have become a relevant factor in the unprecedented information war raging around the shootdown of flight Malaysia MH17.
Continue reading “MH17 – Billy versus Bensmann”
July 26, 2015
More than a year has passed since Malaysian flight MH17 crashed, but we are still waiting for the publication of “overwhelming evidence” of Russian culpability.
June 12, 2015
– by Irina Petrakova, journalist from Moscow, Russia.
A week ago Almaz-Antey, the manufacturer of Buk, held a press conference. During this very interesting event the engineers of the company explained in detail what is wrong with the Western narratives.
Explicitly not excluded by spokesmen of Almaz Antey: the scenario in which air-to-air missiles fired by fighter jet(s) played a role.
June 3, 2015
Three weeks ago, a group of anonymous engineers sent a report to the Russian opposition paper Novaya Gazeta. The newpaper published the findings of these engineers in the article “It was Buk-M1”.
Continue reading “MH17 – Bad Day for the Putin-did-it-crowd”
June 1, 2015
Preliminary review about Bellingcat’s newest report ‘Forensic Analysis of Satellite Images Released by the Russian Ministry of Defense’. (Link to Bellingcat)
Author
This review is written By Charles Wood B.Sc MIEEE MACS.
Continue reading “About Bellingcat’s claim: “Russian sat pics fake””
January 24, 2015
In this article I will dissect a particularly vicious piece of propaganda disseminated by RTL Nieuws on December 22nd 2014. For practical purposes split up in four separate sections with transcripts and my comments.
September 29, 2015
Immediately after flight Malaysia MH17 was shot down the West started a vicious campaign putting all the blame on Russia, more specifically President Vladimir Putin. But more than a year later still no shred of evidence has been presented to the public.
September 29, 2015
Russia and Defense expert Hans de Vreij didn’t like my interview in Sputnik:
After my tweet: “Dutch Ministry of Truth rep @hdevreij and my hat is nicer than yours”……
……. a typical example of Dutch pluriform inquisitive open for debate journalists response:
September 11, 2015
In anticipation of the Dutch Safety Board’s final report expected to be released October 13, it can’t harm to publish the latest research conducted by Michael Kobs and others dissecting social media ‘proof’ a Russian Buk supposedly downed MH17.
Continue reading “MH17 – Haunt the BUK”
July 26, 2015
Digitally altered image posted within 3 hours after MH17 crashed.
More than a year has passed since Malaysian flight MH17 crashed, but we are still waiting for the publication of “overwhelming evidence” of Russian culpability.
The only ‘visual proof’ a Buk missile was fired from rebel controlled territory is a photo posted by an anonymous Twitter account three hours after the crash.
July 12, 2015
Mainstream media start to acknowledge Kiev lied about not having jet fighters in the air. Good moment to look at alternative Buk narratives.
